“We are better than Brazil” My ass, Brazil are unstoppable and portugal
have only won 2 world cups .”
Pele is the best
We’ll just have to agree to disagree about that.
to be honest.. my favorite par is 12:15 :0 my gosh! I love pele and
brazilian football tho!
Gagan. Just smack your self!
Nah, he’s still way overrated, and he’s teammates from then are underrated.
My opinion.
Well the fact that Puskas considered Pele the greatest player, even greater
than Di Stefano, is worth remembering. He literally said that no player
should be compared to Pele. There is no other player dead or alive that has
transcended football like Pele. He is the living embodiment of the
beautiful game. By the age of 21 he was already a legend with his feats for
club AND country. What separates him from almost everyone else was his
longetivity at the top. Truth hurts but it is what it is.
@andreyus08 im not ignorant like you who only read statistics. eusebio won
a golden boot, pele never won it. if pele was born irish he’ll never be
famous, brazil will win those world cup even without pele. puskas won the
golden ball in 54, he played a major part unlike pele who only play in the
second round in 58, garrincha won the golden ball, and in 62 he didnt play
at all but he got the winning medal, puskas only play one world cup. di
stefano cant represent his country cuz of fifa regulation
Eusebio was one of the greatest, you dont know anything
GREATEST EVER!
Your useless attempt to try and discredit Pele and his status as the
greatest football player of alltime, is no different than those who try to
discredit Sugar Ray Robinson as the greatest pound for pound boxer of
alltime or Muhammed Ali as the greatest heavyweight champion, and Michael
Jordan as the greatest basketball player of alltime. So it ain’t nothing
new. I know it hurts you, but you can’t change history.
Mario Zagallo is such a racist person: “when we saw him, who’s that black
kid” I never knew Brazil would have the same black stereotype just like in
Europe.
then who is the best?
Una mano al pecho hay un jugador mas completo q el rey…no lo hay,el mejor
de todos los tiempos .
because he wasn’t playing in the 50’s? greatness is not confined to one
generation.
How many times Puskas FACED Pele ?! Yep, that;s right, ZERO 0, NADA,
NIENTE, NULL Clint Eastwood once said that everyone has an… “asshole”.
That’s Puskas’s opinion. thank you
*the only reason why eusebio
You can’t directly compare players from 2 different eras, you have to look
at their impact in the game while they were playing. Pele was widely
recognized the best player in the world from 1958 to 1970. If Messi or
Cristiano Ronaldo can stay at the top of the world for 12 consecutive years
(winning a WC in their farewells), then they can compare to Pele.
so he was excellent player who was best player in world for like 20 years
who was best player in two different eras,eras that produced some of most
greatest players of all times and he was best of them all,but he is not the
best of all times couse he have awesome team mates around him but let me
guess Messi is,guy who is only good playing for machinery called Barcelona
while outside of that machinery he is insignificant
Ajax won three EC1, Feyenoord 2 in the 70’s. You really are dumb!
@rifway22 In 62 he didn’t play at all??? In 62 he played in the first two
games. He scored in the first games, and got injured early in the second
game. In 58 he scored goal in the quater final, scored a hat trick in
semi-finals and was man of the match, and scored two goals in the final and
was man of the match. He was only 17 years old! He won the young player of
the tournament. 12 years later at 29 he was still the best player in the
world. He won the golden ball for the 1970 world cup.
the best!
@bolder2009 well george best in that time and cruyff also did great things
with a ball but pele he is an inventor just like cruyff
If at Pelé’s era it was easy, we’d have Pelés everywhere. Simple as that!
Tell me, how many players in the 50’s and 60’s scored 1000 goals at age 29
? It wasn’t easy, he is who made it look easy. Pelé doesn’t actually need
any statistics. He was simply the most complete player ever. With a special
highlight to his headers, Pelé is just 1,73m tall (5’8).
Because he was dubbed a ‘national treasure’ in Brazil and his team was
forbidden by the government to sell him you dumb ass. Besides, if you think
that a match between e.g. Fluminense and Santos has no pressure you’re evn
dumber than dumb. Supporters over there get physical against a player who
doesn’t deliver!
“We are better than Brazil” My ass, Brazil are unstoppable and portugal
have only won 2 world cups .”
Pele is the best
We’ll just have to agree to disagree about that.
to be honest.. my favorite par is 12:15 :0 my gosh! I love pele and
brazilian football tho!
Gagan. Just smack your self!
Nah, he’s still way overrated, and he’s teammates from then are underrated.
My opinion.
Well the fact that Puskas considered Pele the greatest player, even greater
than Di Stefano, is worth remembering. He literally said that no player
should be compared to Pele. There is no other player dead or alive that has
transcended football like Pele. He is the living embodiment of the
beautiful game. By the age of 21 he was already a legend with his feats for
club AND country. What separates him from almost everyone else was his
longetivity at the top. Truth hurts but it is what it is.
@andreyus08 im not ignorant like you who only read statistics. eusebio won
a golden boot, pele never won it. if pele was born irish he’ll never be
famous, brazil will win those world cup even without pele. puskas won the
golden ball in 54, he played a major part unlike pele who only play in the
second round in 58, garrincha won the golden ball, and in 62 he didnt play
at all but he got the winning medal, puskas only play one world cup. di
stefano cant represent his country cuz of fifa regulation
Eusebio was one of the greatest, you dont know anything
GREATEST EVER!
Your useless attempt to try and discredit Pele and his status as the
greatest football player of alltime, is no different than those who try to
discredit Sugar Ray Robinson as the greatest pound for pound boxer of
alltime or Muhammed Ali as the greatest heavyweight champion, and Michael
Jordan as the greatest basketball player of alltime. So it ain’t nothing
new. I know it hurts you, but you can’t change history.
Mario Zagallo is such a racist person: “when we saw him, who’s that black
kid” I never knew Brazil would have the same black stereotype just like in
Europe.
then who is the best?
Una mano al pecho hay un jugador mas completo q el rey…no lo hay,el mejor
de todos los tiempos .
because he wasn’t playing in the 50’s? greatness is not confined to one
generation.
How many times Puskas FACED Pele ?! Yep, that;s right, ZERO 0, NADA,
NIENTE, NULL Clint Eastwood once said that everyone has an… “asshole”.
That’s Puskas’s opinion. thank you
*the only reason why eusebio
You can’t directly compare players from 2 different eras, you have to look
at their impact in the game while they were playing. Pele was widely
recognized the best player in the world from 1958 to 1970. If Messi or
Cristiano Ronaldo can stay at the top of the world for 12 consecutive years
(winning a WC in their farewells), then they can compare to Pele.
so he was excellent player who was best player in world for like 20 years
who was best player in two different eras,eras that produced some of most
greatest players of all times and he was best of them all,but he is not the
best of all times couse he have awesome team mates around him but let me
guess Messi is,guy who is only good playing for machinery called Barcelona
while outside of that machinery he is insignificant
Ajax won three EC1, Feyenoord 2 in the 70’s. You really are dumb!
@rifway22 In 62 he didn’t play at all??? In 62 he played in the first two
games. He scored in the first games, and got injured early in the second
game. In 58 he scored goal in the quater final, scored a hat trick in
semi-finals and was man of the match, and scored two goals in the final and
was man of the match. He was only 17 years old! He won the young player of
the tournament. 12 years later at 29 he was still the best player in the
world. He won the golden ball for the 1970 world cup.
the best!
@bolder2009 well george best in that time and cruyff also did great things
with a ball but pele he is an inventor just like cruyff
If at Pelé’s era it was easy, we’d have Pelés everywhere. Simple as that!
Tell me, how many players in the 50’s and 60’s scored 1000 goals at age 29
? It wasn’t easy, he is who made it look easy. Pelé doesn’t actually need
any statistics. He was simply the most complete player ever. With a special
highlight to his headers, Pelé is just 1,73m tall (5’8).
Because he was dubbed a ‘national treasure’ in Brazil and his team was
forbidden by the government to sell him you dumb ass. Besides, if you think
that a match between e.g. Fluminense and Santos has no pressure you’re evn
dumber than dumb. Supporters over there get physical against a player who
doesn’t deliver!